patching...
Breaking: Hiker Evacuated by Helicopter at Eaton Canyon »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Photo Gallery: Art Hanging on Fences

Over 350 paintings have been hung on a fence outside the MonteCedro retirement home from artists ranging from ages 5-100.

 
0 of 0
Photos (21)

Photos

An art opening was held Sunday  afternoon in Altadena at the MonteCedro retirement home to showcase paintings that were created by a wide variety of people from the community.

The Sophie Miller Foundation , among other foundations, hosted the show, which was called "Art from the Heart".

Over 350 paintings were hung outside on the chain link fence that gated in an empty lot that will be the future cite for MonteCedro, a retirement facility for seniors. The paintings were by participants ranging from 5 years old to 100 years old.

Participating groups include the Altadena Elementary school, Aveson Charter School, Eliot Middle School, Five Acre, Hillsides, Odyssey Charter School, Pasadena Waldorf School, St. Mark's Episcopal School, Villa Esperanza, Scripps Kensington, The Canterbury, the Covington, and the Episcopal Home Communities' three retirement homes.

Janelle Morton, the President of the Sophie Miller Foundation, said the art is meant to be hung up to make the area more appealing and inviting.

 

Steve Lamb

6:11 am on Tuesday, November 9, 2010

At the same time the LAC zoning department is depriving local community businesses of their signs, and during a time when grafitti is an excuse to harass all black men, the monte cedro developers are celebrated for basically placing grafitti on three blocks of fence, just because the images are by children, who BTW are now being taught that grafitti is acceptable.

I don't really understand the major disconnects here. Why is a well lettered sign in front of Webster's a crime, and an ugly poorly done piece of "art" by a child who was conscripted during school hours to work for this developer and then used as a three block long sign and advertisement for this developer celebrated?

Reply

Lisa Hastings

10:10 am on Tuesday, November 9, 2010

I live across the street from this hideous display masquerading as a feel-good public relations ploy. My neighbors and I do not appreciate this eyesore and traffic distraction installed by a developer that will bring more traffic and noise to our neighborhood with its densely-populated, four story luxury apartment complex masquerading as a compassionate "aging in place" facility for seniors. Apparently, Monte Cedro is not required to comply with the county ordinance that prohibits this gaudy and hideous display masquerading as "art."

Reply

Lisa Hastings

10:23 am on Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Facts about Monte Cedro which can be verified by visiting their website: The four story luxury complex will contain 186 apartment units and only 19 assisted living units. Once a senior needs assisted living, he or she will be lucky if there is an opening in one of the only 19 assisted living units in the development. If there is no opening, then he or she will need to hire their own in-home care or move to another facility. Then, once a senior needs skilled nursing care, he or she will have to move out of Monte Cedro because unlike the Scripps Home that the developer closed and demolished, Monte Cedro will have no skilled nursing care. Monte Cedro is running a scam on seniors by advertising that their facility will offer "aging in place." The Scripps Home, which Monte Cedro destroyed, was truly and "aging in place" facility where seniors were cared for until they passed away. Monte Cedro will be nothing more than a luxury apartment complex developed with the help of tax and financing incentives and discounts because it is being marketed to seniors.

Reply

Leslie Aitken

4:50 pm on Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Steve Lamb and Lisa Hastings...............SHAME ON YOU! How about taking off your Scrooge hats for a few minutes and take a minute to appreciate the beautiful and joyful art that I saw when I drove up El Molino yesterday. Steve, I am appalled at you for calling their work, "ugly poorly done piece of "art" by a child", grousing about them working on these during school hours (surely you remember ART CLASSES), and then calling it graffiti. Then Lisa, you call it a "hideous display", "eyesore", "gaudy" and "traffic distraction"!! How dare you both be so very mean spirited about work done by children and artists? Who was so harsh with you as children that you would think it okay to unleash your acrimony on them? UNFAIR!! Take your trenchant political agenda somewhere else before you hurt the feelings of artists and children!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lisa Hastings

5:25 pm on Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Leslie, just do me a favor and don't crash into my house the next time you drive up El Molino all giddy and intoxicated by the art you see hanging on that fence. And yep, I hate children and artists and--you forgot to mention----seniors! LOL

Leslie Aitken

7:25 pm on Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Lisa: cur·mudg·eon/kərˈməjən/
Noun: A bad-tempered or surly person
(ker MUJ en) noun A cantankerous person; an ill-tempered and disagreeable person

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Dan Abendschein

1:57 pm on Saturday, November 13, 2010

Leslie- Please refrain from using personal insults against people in these forums. It's fine to comment on views that people have expressed but there is no need to turn to name-calling, even in a mild form.

Comment_arrow

Leslie Aitken

4:35 pm on Saturday, November 13, 2010

Dan:

I never called anyone a curmudgeon, as in _____ you are a curmudgeon. I simply listed the Webster's definition of the word, just in case any bad-tempered, surly, cantankerous and disagreeable people wanted to examine their comments or motives made about children's art. If said people are overly sensitive about their written comments in a public forum, then so be it. If you want to censor my listing of definitions to protect anyone hurt by the definition of a word.....well....perhaps people who live in glass house shouldn't throw stones.

Steve Lamb

6:18 am on Wednesday, November 10, 2010

@ Leslie-Uh, WOW! SO if we call it art, and don't pay children to make it, (and gee I thought that would be child SLAVERY or some kind of Soviet/commie style child propaganda enterprise) our non local not for profit who have destroyed the hope of all of Altadenas not rich to have a decent old age if they fall unable, can violate laws that other local businesses must obey to advertise our business. .. Really? Being against child slavery and abusive conduct makes ME Scrooge and a Curmudgeon? I'll take those from you as badges of honor- thanks.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Leslie Aitken

7:33 am on Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Steve -- At this point, I all most feel it is a waste of my time to respond to your semi hysterical points of view. Child slavery, really? My kids were involved in many projects through their schools where their art was displayed at a mall or civic (Pasadena) function. My youngest submitted a piece of art that eventually was used in DC as part of an art in America project. None of them were coerced or paid. It just seems that there is no winning with the likes of you and Lisa. You will keep seeing the worst in most every situation and intent and my only choice is to do what many others probably do, ignore you and your consistently negative comments and complaints.

Steve Lamb

8:34 am on Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Leslie-
As a actual real live practicing artist, yes, Child slavery and also an endeavor that teaches people to believe that somehow all artists should work for free. I am so happy your childs work was recognized, I am so sorry you feel it has no actual value. I am also sorry that you approve of conditioning children to place no actual value except a warm fuzzy on art.

As to how to win with me, its really really really easy. apply the rules evenly.

I choose to ignore your unfounded personal insults, so I'm totally fine if you ignore my comments, but I am sure its a vain hope and an empty promise that you will do so.

Reply

Lisa Hastings

10:48 am on Thursday, November 11, 2010

Mother of Artful Children, If you are opposed to the Monte Cedro development that will eventually take over and overshadow my quiet neighborhood, then you should not have allowed your children to be used as pawns in Monte Cedro's public relations ploy to to USE children and USE art to garner support for their project. The reactions posted on Patch to my complaints--alleging that I dislike children and the community--are totally untrue and play right into the Monte Cedro's plan to gain community support for their project. If you knew anything about ME you would know that the attacks and insults hurled at me on Patch are totally unfounded--that I am indeed a lover of art and children, as I am an occasional artist myself, a mother, grandmother, and staunch advocate for seniors who are victims of financial elder abuse.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mother of Artful children

12:04 pm on Thursday, November 11, 2010

Lisa, it's my quiet neighborhood too. but your own words speak the opposite of "lover of art and children" when you wrote "I live across the street from this hideous display..." and
"My neighbors and I do not appreciate this eyesore and traffic distraction..."
Our kids were not pawns in the MC development, the teachers at my school involved in this project did not do this in any way for MC. You are being called out by community & parents on this board and getting press because you trashed the kids' work and effort and called them "eyesores." If you truly care about the kids and their place in our community then promote them. Feel free to fight against MC's dastardly development but attacking the kids is unwarranted.

Lisa Hastings

10:48 am on Thursday, November 11, 2010

Monte Cedro destroyed the Scripps Home that coexisted peacefully in my neighborhood and provided Altadena seniors of all financial means a place to live in dignity during their last days on earth. Monte Cedro will offer nothing of that and will be instead, an overbuilt luxury apartment complex for ambulatory seniors and will not provide the level of care that the Scripps Home provided to seniors during their last days on earth. Aside from all of this, it is grossly unfair for Monte Cedro to be immune from our county's sign ordinances that are being enforced on Lake Avenue against businesses that are already struggling to stay in business. Monte Cedro has already been issued a violation by the county for butchering the protected oak trees on that property. Monte Cedro already has demonstrated that is not a good neighbor by arrogantly operating as if it is immune from the county rules that the rest of us are expected to follow.

Reply

Mother of Artful children

10:52 am on Thursday, November 11, 2010

Steve, how does an artist himself want to discourage these kid's artistic endeavors? And saying these works TEACH graffiti... ? that is quite the stretch. Artists don't discourage art. I am an artist, my kids are both very into art, and YES they have pieces hanging on the fence. Folks like you and Lisa who are twisting this attempt by our kids and schools to beautify Altadena really sadden me and my neighbors. hope you both can find peace and maybe a different cause to take up.

Reply

Lisa Hastings

12:31 pm on Thursday, November 11, 2010

Mother of Artful children, the banners on that fence serve as a promotion for Monte Cedro, which you refer to as "this dastardly development." Your children posted their art on a fence owned by Monte Cedro, directly or indirectly at the invitation of Monte Cedro as part of their public relations campaign. If you truly believed that the Monte Cedro project was a "dastardly development," then you would have declined the invitation and encouraged other parents and your children's school to do the same.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mother of Artful children

2:49 pm on Thursday, November 11, 2010

Sorry Lisa I was chiming in with you on the 'dastardly development' part because I read what you said they were putting in place (and how you enjoyed the former Scripps home) so I figured that MC was pretty darn dastardly. Neither we nor the children agreed to promote MC or know they were involved. I do not see how we helping their campaign to put in a development the neighborhood does not want. We displayed community art on an otherwise ugly chain link fence and our kids are proud of their work. They won't be scarred for life if it is ripped down, but I wonder if the older ones learn their work was deemed 'a distracting eyesore' by the very community they did it for, what will that say to them? Many of these kids are underprivileged and got so into this project, it saddens us to know some folks have deemed it unseemly.

Steve Lamb

12:40 pm on Thursday, November 11, 2010

Dear alleged Mother of Artful children-

Whoever you may really be, I actually am and have been for some thirty years a real live practicing Artist. I happen to believe that these happy fuzzy warm corporate advertising ventures are harmful to kids, communities and artists and guess what? I believe in what I believe in enough to USE MY REAL NAME. And BTW, who are you to say what view I may hold and then declare that if I hold the view that members of my profession should be paid, that somehow I am disqualified from membership therein? I bet YOU get paid at YOUR job. I bet you belong to a professional organization that discourages wage destroying efforts like so called contests involving the free provision of professional services in your profession. Guess what I do too. And guess what, when you equate childrens drawings done for a for profit motive with art, you are cheapening all artistic professions. So EXCUSE ME for not enjoying the exploitation of these children by this greedy corporation and for saying doing so is an injustice to them and all real working artists, aside from also being behavior that the County of Los Angeles will not allow from any other business.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mother of Artful children

2:36 pm on Thursday, November 11, 2010

Sorry you feel I was hiding behind my moniker. we live close to the 'art heart exhibit' as we call it, but I have 2 small children and a very shy husband :) I am a creative, an artist who gets paid and has been "practicing" (and really a-live too!) at my profession for 25 years. I do not know where you think I said your belief that 'artists' should be paid' is a bad one... you seem to have me confused with another poster arguing with you there. I could not make a living just like you were I not paid... as I work for myself I might not make as much as I'd like, but we do okay. You do yourself a disservice by trying to put me in some cockamamie 'organization,' - oh my ,that made me LOL . Trying to paint me as you want me to be won't change the fact that we are actually alike in professions! The point really is these children and our school made an artistic endeavor and learned about art (imagine!) in this exercise. These kids are innocent and so were/are the parents. If we were duped by the MC -- then we were duped! Shaming the kids for their work is so sadly unnecessary. You all may win in having the kid's work torn down... and then if MC creates whatever they are developing, will putting down the majority of your community and it's kids/schools have been worth it, is the question.

Lisa Hastings

1:12 pm on Thursday, November 11, 2010

Another FACT about Monte Cedro that can be verified by visiting their website:
The residents of the Scripps Home that Monte Cedro closed and demolished, were moved to the Kensington in Alhambra. Here is the problem: The Scripps Home offered SKILLED NURSING CARE and so does the Kensington. So, those residents who require this care will not be able to move to Monte Cedro because according to Monte Cedro's website (check it out yourself), Monte Cedro will NOT offer skilled nursing care. Another example about how Monte Cedro has failed Altadena seniors. Anyone who supports this art project on the fence is supporting the sham that Monte Cedro has perpetuated on this community.

Reply

Lisa Hastings

1:14 pm on Thursday, November 11, 2010

Monte Cedro PROMISED those former Scripps residents that are now at the Kensington that they could move back to Monte Cedro. This is a FALSE promise for residents who require nursing care.

Reply

Steve Lamb

2:08 pm on Thursday, November 11, 2010

@ Lisa-Yep. Just another forked tongued developer.

Reply

Lisa Hastings

3:20 pm on Thursday, November 11, 2010

Mother of Artful children, I am not surprised to find out that the Monte Cedro developers cleverly concealed to you the fact that Monte Cedro was behind this children's art project. A good lesson for your children about responsible community behavior would be to send a message to Monte Cedro that you do not approve of their deception and their bad neighbor/corporate behavior in OUR neighborhood by removing your children's art from that fence.

Reply

Lisa Hastings

5:01 pm on Saturday, November 13, 2010

Dan, I agree 100% with Leslie about your instructions to her to stop name-calling. Providing this type of instruction to people only discourages people. Some people like forums where the moderator is constantly managing the posts. That usually happens where people rely on the moderator to silent the opposition. I agree that you should remove posts that are racist or vulgar or otherwise not fit to be printed in a newspaper. But I'm sure that many will agree with me that Patch is a great place to post comments because Patch encourages discussion and does not try to direct the discussion or censor it.

Reply

Leave a comment