.
Feedback

CPUC President Blasts Edison on Windstorm Response

Investigators at the California Public Utilities Commission estimate that 13.4 percent of Southern California Edison power poles had too much weight on them prior to the windstorm, according to their preliminary report

CPUC President Michael Peevey blasted Southern California Edison at a hearing in Sacramento Wednesday over the utility's response to damage and power outages from the Nov. 30 windstorm in and around the San Gabriel Valley.

"To some degree this was a botched operation," Peevey said following a preliminary report of findings by investigators looking into the utility's response.

Peevey--who was formerly President of Edison International and Southern California Edison Company before being appointed to the CPUC--brought up a and said he had expected utilities to learn and improve their own public safety processes since then, even in a situation like the November windstorms where the weather was extremely unusual.

"It is difficult to have adequate preparation for such an unlikely event," Peevey said. "But what it shows me is that a year and a half ago we had San Bruno and made safety our top priority, ... but Edison and others are not keeping up with what we want from them and expect from them”

He said the investigation would continue and that there would be "serious consequences" if the findings revealed so far are substantiated.

Power Poles Overloaded

In its initial findings, CPUC officials told the commission Wednesday that it appears a significant percentage of Southern California Edison utility poles were out of compliance with commission rules governing the weight of equipment prior to November's windstorms.

Ray Fugere, of the commission's Consumer Protection & Safety Division, briefed the commission Wednesday on the preliminary findings of investigators.  The full results of the investigation are still pending.

Fugere told the commission investigators estimated that 13.4 percent of the poles were overloaded with equipment.

However, he also said the figures are just estimates because many of the utility poles that Edison workers removed were destroyed.  CPUC rules requiring the utilities preserve removed poles so that investigators can determine the cause of their destruction appear to have been violated, Fugere said. 

He noted that only five out of 200 poles examined by investigators were able to be put back together--the rest were in segments, chopped up by utility workers.

With the poles destroyed, CPSD officials had to conduct their investigation by looking at poles that are still standing next to where the fallen poles were removed--investigators surveyed the weight of equipment on those poles and extrapolated what the likely weight of equipment on the fallen poles was.

Other Findings

Investigators' preliminary findings also included:

  • Edison's mean power restoration times following the wind storm were twice as long as the next closest utility affected by the storms, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
  • Many of the required CPUC contacts listed in Edison's emergency plan had long since retired from the state commission when the wind storm hit.
  • Edison employees at phone lines created specifically for government and large customer inquiries had no more information on the power outages than those at the residential customer information lines.

No Southern California Edison officials spoke at the hearing.

Power Poles Destroyed

Fugere said that following the removal of poles during the windstorm, many of them were destroyed and broken into pieces that were impossible to put back together.

He said that the 200 poles shown to investigators were basically all mixed together in individual cut-up segments left in dumpsters.

Investigators were unable to put back together most of the poles.

Fugere did not say whether investigators believed their destruction was deliberate or an attempt to avoid scrutiny of whether they were improperly overloaded or not.  He did note though that sometimes circumstances require utilities to cut up poles to remove them, and that preserving them could have slowed down the utility's efforts to restore power.

Comparison to Other Utilities

CPUC investigators also compiled data on response times showing that the median customer power restoration time for Edison customers was twice as long as for Los Angeles Department Water and Power customers, and more than six times as long than Glendale Water and Power restoration times.  Figures for Pasadena Water and Power had not yet been made available, according to Fugere.

Fugere also noted that SoCal Edison areas got hit harder than Glendale or LADWP, noting that 75 percent of Edison customers in the San Gabriel Valley lost power at some point following the wind storms, compared to almost 35 percent for GWP customers.  About 9 percent of Edison's total customers, which includes ones in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties, lost power.

Fugere did not go into details on why Edison took longer to restore power.

Communications

Besides having outdated contact information for CPUC officials, Edison also had the misfortune of having a ranking local public affairs officer retire the day before the windstorm.

That left many government officials in Southern California unsure of who to talk to for information on the crisis, Fugere said.

We are seeking comment from Edison officials on the findings and will post their response if we receive it.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Altadena Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Liz H. May 20, 2013 at 05:38 am
For crying out loud! You can't even spell "secede" and you want to run your own state?
C.O. May 20, 2013 at 04:48 pm
Caution - use of this device could cause lasting knee injury. Just sayin...
Jessica Hamlin (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 09:04 am
Thank you for the feedback, Lisa! Glad you were able to find the Opinion Board to express yourselfRead More though. :) Opinions, business updates, etc. are easier than ever to share and see right away on the site.
Ivan G May 19, 2013 at 10:19 pm
Sadly. I have to agree.
Buzlightyear aka marty May 16, 2013 at 10:05 pm
No. no emails here. But it does look like everyone "has left the building". No one isRead More commenting since the changed. perhaps everyone is shell-shocked.
Bridgette Braxton March 6, 2013 at 06:07 pm
Thanks Jessica for posting my ad, you have helped in more ways then you know.
Jessica Hamlin (Editor) March 6, 2013 at 05:54 pm
Great to hear! Glad your dog is home.
Bridgette Braxton March 6, 2013 at 05:08 pm
Thank you everyone Dakota is now at home.